Reflections on aspects of teacher evaluation in Ecuador

  • Edgar Isch L.

Resumen

For many years the National Teachers’ Union(UNE) has demanded that there be comprehensive education evaluation systems in Ecuador. They challenged governments to present their proposals and contrast them with what had been achieved. Of course, governments never wanted to bring to light their demagogy and inconsistencies. Not even in the projects with external debt did they use comprehensive evaluations that demonstrated an improvement in education. At the end of the World Bank’s EB/PRODEC project, it was pointed out: Unfortunately, to date there is no comprehensive evaluation that allows us to understand and assess in a complete manner the main achievements and difficulties that this model’s implementation has had.

Previous missions recommended carrying out such an evaluation

Biografía del autor/a

Edgar Isch L.

Ecuadorian University Professor. Member of IDEA Education Research network.

Citas

Ecuadorian Constitution (2008). Available at: http://

www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf

Intercultural Education Law (LOEI) (2012). Available

at: http://www.evaluacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/

downloads/2015/06/Anexo-b.-LOEI.pdf

Ministry of Education (2016). The Minister of Education

shared the new model of evaluation of teacher

performance “Ser Maestro” (Being a Teacher). Available

at: https://educacion.gob.ec/el-ministro-de-educacion-

socializo-el-nuevo-modelo-evaluacion-de-desempeno-

docente-ser-maestro/

PUCE-CELA (2004). Interim evaluation of the

Autonomous Rural School Networks Program. Final

report. Quito, April 2004.

Teachers Network (2015). Proposal from the Teaching

Community on the outcomes of the Ten-Year

Plan 2016-2025.

Vargas, S. (2016). The lost decade in education.

Available at: http://es.idea-network.ca/investigaciones/

la-decada-perdida-en-educacion

Publicado
2017-12-21